On the A7 while heading south on November 30, 2008. Not the first photo on this blog out of a car window, but this time I was the driver. I forgot how fast I was when I took the photo, but I like to think that it wasn't dangerous. I snapped this when it started to rain and it definitely came out as expected.
The M8.2 at ISO 320, converted using TrueGrain. Uncropped, but the photo needed a border.
2010-01-31
2010-01-30
2010-01-29
Headless
This picture of a shop window in Hamburg is the first film photo on this blog that was cropped. And it was a considerable crop. In fact, I shot the photo in landscape format and then cropped a portrait format section out of it because this is how I should have framed it originally. Even after taking photos for more than 15 years I still don't think of using the camera in the upright position often enough.
Taken in January 2010 with the M7 and the 35mm Summicron. Tri-X in HC-110.
Taken in January 2010 with the M7 and the 35mm Summicron. Tri-X in HC-110.
2010-01-28
Love
Somewhere in Haifa on August 11, 1995.
Is it OK to photograph people from behind? Some people think it isn't and are very vocal in their opposition against it. I think they are misled - either by some "code of honor" which probably originates from watching too many western movies or by their notion (which they try to impose on everybody else) that street photography is only valid if you're shooting street portraits after reaching a mutual agreement between the photographer and the subject.
If that wasn't clear already, I totally disagree. There are lots of reasons why in certain situations "shooting" people from behind is OK. And you should never have to justify how your photos were created - if you think they're good, that's fine.
Shot with the Nikon on Tri-X which I developed in Rodinal.
Is it OK to photograph people from behind? Some people think it isn't and are very vocal in their opposition against it. I think they are misled - either by some "code of honor" which probably originates from watching too many western movies or by their notion (which they try to impose on everybody else) that street photography is only valid if you're shooting street portraits after reaching a mutual agreement between the photographer and the subject.
If that wasn't clear already, I totally disagree. There are lots of reasons why in certain situations "shooting" people from behind is OK. And you should never have to justify how your photos were created - if you think they're good, that's fine.
Shot with the Nikon on Tri-X which I developed in Rodinal.
2010-01-27
Football
We'll have another World Cup this year, so it's high time to start with the preparations. My contribution is this picture that I took in Hamburg on June 10, 2009. The punchline, a bit hard to see at this size, is that the ball was Made in Italy.
M8.2 at ISO 160 with the 35mm Summicron, converted using TrueGrain.
M8.2 at ISO 160 with the 35mm Summicron, converted using TrueGrain.
2010-01-26
2010-01-25
Rain
It's an interesting question why one likes some photos more than others. Trying to put this into words is a valuable exercise in itself but becomes even more crucial if you think about showing your own photos to others. Will they be able to see in your picture what you see in it? Will they share your feelings about it? The answer is most likely no although, if you're lucky, the reaction of your viewers is at least similar to yours.
I like this picture mainly because of how the foreground is separated from the background. There's no interesting subject matter to write home about, but due to the lens probably being wide open and the way it rendered the scene and due to the movement of the car while the two pedestrians are motionless the whole scene to me looks as if the couple wasn't standing on a sidewalk in Midtown New York but rather in front of the silver screen in a movie theater. And this, in turn, makes this image kind of a comment on photography itself which is often viewed as an objective way to take pictures but which can mechanically capture what (you think) you've seen and turn it into something completely different.
Shot on October 5, 1995 with the M4-P and the 50mm Summicron. The film was Tri-X which I developed in HC-110.
I like this picture mainly because of how the foreground is separated from the background. There's no interesting subject matter to write home about, but due to the lens probably being wide open and the way it rendered the scene and due to the movement of the car while the two pedestrians are motionless the whole scene to me looks as if the couple wasn't standing on a sidewalk in Midtown New York but rather in front of the silver screen in a movie theater. And this, in turn, makes this image kind of a comment on photography itself which is often viewed as an objective way to take pictures but which can mechanically capture what (you think) you've seen and turn it into something completely different.
Shot on October 5, 1995 with the M4-P and the 50mm Summicron. The film was Tri-X which I developed in HC-110.
2010-01-24
2010-01-23
8 Eyes
In the Akihabara area of Tokyo on November 10, 2008. I'm not sure anymore if the title was inspired by the photo's content or if I was rather subconsciously reminded of a Japanese Jazz LP called "Eight Eyes and Eight Ears" which I've had for a long time.
Taken with the M8.2 and the 28mm Elmarit at ISO 320.
The picture was converted directly to black-and-white in Lightroom without the aid of external tools. It was then slightly cropped and I added a small border because it looked as if it would otherwise fall apart.
Taken with the M8.2 and the 28mm Elmarit at ISO 320.
The picture was converted directly to black-and-white in Lightroom without the aid of external tools. It was then slightly cropped and I added a small border because it looked as if it would otherwise fall apart.
2010-01-22
Gents
The entrance to the changing room of my gym in Hamburg. Taken last Monday - which makes this the first photo from 2010 and I think the photo with the shortest lag between exposure and posting so far.
It's also the first photo on this blog that I've shot with my new M7. It's a used one (from 2001), of course, and I swapped it for my M8.2 three weeks ago. Economically, that's certainly a disaster, but for me it was an important step towards concentrating more on "classical" film photography and I felt like Lucky Hans after I left the store.
Speaking of photos which rhyme with each other, this one seems like one that could be paired with one I posted two days ago. I always liked the idea of rhymes in photography. Just the other day, I was reading Wim Wenders's foreword to Sylvia Plachy's Signs and Relics again where he describes how he "discovered" that photos can rhyme. A good foreword for a very nice book from a great photographer.
The lens was the 35mm Summicron, film was Tri-X which I developed in HC-110.
It's also the first photo on this blog that I've shot with my new M7. It's a used one (from 2001), of course, and I swapped it for my M8.2 three weeks ago. Economically, that's certainly a disaster, but for me it was an important step towards concentrating more on "classical" film photography and I felt like Lucky Hans after I left the store.
Speaking of photos which rhyme with each other, this one seems like one that could be paired with one I posted two days ago. I always liked the idea of rhymes in photography. Just the other day, I was reading Wim Wenders's foreword to Sylvia Plachy's Signs and Relics again where he describes how he "discovered" that photos can rhyme. A good foreword for a very nice book from a great photographer.
The lens was the 35mm Summicron, film was Tri-X which I developed in HC-110.
2010-01-21
2010-01-20
On the run
It's the third time already that I'm mentioning Garry Winogrand in this blog. The funny thing is that I don't even like his photos that much. I do think, though, that some of his one-liners about photography are very deep. "I photograph because I want to see what the world looks like photographed," is one of my favorites. It sounds banal first, but in my opinion it isn't, and for me it also explains a lot about why I take photos.
I was reminded of the quote when I looked at this photo again more than half a year after I took it. It's one of those shots where at least consciously I wasn't aware of what exactly I was photographing when I pressed the shutter.
Taken with the M8.2 and the 50mm Summicron at ISO 160 in Genoa on July 5, 2009.
I was reminded of the quote when I looked at this photo again more than half a year after I took it. It's one of those shots where at least consciously I wasn't aware of what exactly I was photographing when I pressed the shutter.
Taken with the M8.2 and the 50mm Summicron at ISO 160 in Genoa on July 5, 2009.
2010-01-18
2010-01-17
2010-01-16
2010-01-15
The tie and the monkey
It's easy and fun to shoot billboards. Somebody already did the hard work of creating a good layout and you just have to find the right detail and frame it. Expect more to come.
This one I found in London near Euston Strret on March 27, 1996. The shutter speed on my Leica was 1/125, the aperture on my 35mm Summicron was 11, and the film was Tri-X which according to my notes I developed in Rodinal.
This one I found in London near Euston Strret on March 27, 1996. The shutter speed on my Leica was 1/125, the aperture on my 35mm Summicron was 11, and the film was Tri-X which according to my notes I developed in Rodinal.
2010-01-14
2010-01-13
Leaving port
Winogrand was accused of always holding the camera at a tilt in order to introduce "graphical dynamism" into his photos. Yeah, maybe, but sometimes a skewed horizon really helps to make a picture - at least in my opinion. This here's from the Staten Island Ferry while leaving Manhattan.
Taken in 1998 with the M4-P on Tri-X.
If I counted correctly, this is the 100th post on this blog. I spent a bit of time finding a picture to fit this "anniversary". As I said in its description, the blog was intended to make me think about photography on a daily basis. It has, over the last months and due to some discussions ensuing from it, become pretty clear to me that a) it will have to end sooner or later and b) there will be something coming after it (but maybe not on the Internet) with the blog having been a stepping stone into the new direction. I believe that the photo from today exemplifies in several ways (that I won't discuss here and probably can't put into words yet anyway) where I'm heading.
Taken in 1998 with the M4-P on Tri-X.
If I counted correctly, this is the 100th post on this blog. I spent a bit of time finding a picture to fit this "anniversary". As I said in its description, the blog was intended to make me think about photography on a daily basis. It has, over the last months and due to some discussions ensuing from it, become pretty clear to me that a) it will have to end sooner or later and b) there will be something coming after it (but maybe not on the Internet) with the blog having been a stepping stone into the new direction. I believe that the photo from today exemplifies in several ways (that I won't discuss here and probably can't put into words yet anyway) where I'm heading.
2010-01-12
2010-01-11
2010-01-10
Poissonnerie
2010-01-09
2010-01-08
Angles
The title says why I selected this picture. I was waiting for someone to walk by in order to shoot the person in the right position relative to the entrance - which already worked the second time I tried. Of course, in cases like this, digital photography is cool as you can instantly check whether you got what you wanted.
Shot in Hamburg on September 26 last year with the M8.2 at ISO 160, converted using TrueGrain.
Shot in Hamburg on September 26 last year with the M8.2 at ISO 160, converted using TrueGrain.
2010-01-07
2010-01-06
2010-01-05
2010-01-04
2010-01-03
Gina Linda Manu
2010-01-02
Skyscraper
In a city like New York, it is very tempting to photograph the skyscrapers - especially if you're living in a place that doesn't have many tall buildings. Here's a variant that I like because of the small cloud on the right that is much lighter and takes up much less space than the house to the left but yet somehow manages to equal its visual weight in the picture.
Taken on October 6, 1995 with the 50mm Summicron on the M4-P. Film was Tri-X.
Addendum: See also this comment.
Taken on October 6, 1995 with the 50mm Summicron on the M4-P. Film was Tri-X.
Addendum: See also this comment.
2010-01-01
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)